From 12fb8f6232ed39ed78382c79049fd061ba809cf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Uwe Hermann Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 15:49:18 +0100 Subject: spiflash: Don't use ambiguous annotation class names. This is not technically a bug since (at least some) datasheets refer to this command as "Chip erase", it just happens to have two different command codes (0x60 and 0xc7). In order to not confuse users with two annotation classes with the same name, we'll call the second one "Chip erase 2" to match the "CE2" short name. This fixes bug #1482. --- decoders/spiflash/lists.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/decoders/spiflash/lists.py b/decoders/spiflash/lists.py index 49993ad..c6e07bf 100644 --- a/decoders/spiflash/lists.py +++ b/decoders/spiflash/lists.py @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ cmds = OrderedDict([ (0xb9, ('DP', 'Deep power down')), (0xbb, ('2READ', '2x I/O read')), # a.k.a. "Fast read dual I/O". (0xc1, ('EXSO', 'Exit secured OTP')), - (0xc7, ('CE2', 'Chip erase')), # Alternative command ID + (0xc7, ('CE2', 'Chip erase 2')), # Alternative command ID (0xd7, ('STATUS', 'Status register read')), (0xd8, ('BE', 'Block erase')), (0xef, ('REMS2', 'Read ID for 2x I/O mode')), -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2