Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The PJDL decoder's previous implementation was incomplete. It assumed
that PAD bits always start with a rising edge. Which made the decoder
miss the next byte when a previous byte's MSB is set, and the last DATA
bit and the next PAD bit kept the signal HIGH between them (no LOW phase
was seen between these symbols).
Keep the check for the LOW level after the byte's last DATA bit within
the bit times' tolerance. But accept when the level remains HIGH, and
check for the HIGH bit's width starting from the end of the last DATA
bit. Also start the PAD bit's annotation from that "virtual" edge.
This patch is based on a fix that was
Submitted-By: Julio Aguirre <jcallano@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Since the spec is vague on the subject, and real world captures were
found to occassionally run on odd clocks, internally prepare to inspect
traffic and interpret its content although the input data is invalid in
the strictest sense. Keep this hack internal, don't suggest to users
that invalid traffic would be perfectly acceptable.
|
|
Rename 'pjon-link' to 'pjon_link' for consistency with other decoders.
|
|
Introduce a protocol decoder which generates 'pjon-link' output from
'logic' input by interpreting the PJDL single wire serial communication
link layer of the PJON protocol stack. This decoder extracts frame
markers, data bytes, as well as their pad/sync decoration. Inspection of
data values, or checks for frame validity remain the responsibility of a
stacked decoder which is shared among several link layer types.
This implementation "violates" the PJDL spec in those places where the
spec is incomplete or vague, and real world traffic would not decode at
all when the strict letter of the spec is applied instead of its spirit.
When in doubt, the decoder implementation errs to the usability side.
Carrier sense detection is incomplete in this version. Data extraction
works for all currently available captures. Recovery from synchronization
loss after glitches is acceptable. Glitch filtering is missing (the spec
is silent on this subject).
|