| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Anything else in the pd.py files doesn't have to be imported/exposed.
|
|
- No newlines at the end of files.
- No trailing ';' characters.
- Comparison with None: Use 'is None' or 'is not None'.
- Comparison with True/False: Use 'if cond:' or 'if not cond:'.
- Various minor whitespace fixes.
|
|
In all current PDs it is not necessary to raise an exception upon
invalid states (of the PD's state machine), since we can guarantee that
no such invalid state can ever be reached in these PDs.
|
|
Older libsigrokdecode versions are no longer able to use the current
versions of the PDs (various changes in syntax etc).
|
|
At the moment we don't yet support PDs which take both input from
another PD (which they're stacked on top of) and from one or more
logic inputs/pins.
This will be supported later on, and at that time we'll bring back
these changes.
|
|
Annotation entries also consist of a tuple, not a list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The single comment re-stating the PD's name / description / purpose in
each pd.py file is not really needed, that info is available in the
Decoder class' attributes already.
|
|
|
|
This automatically figures out the files to install for each protocol
decoder, without involving autotools.
All python files (filenames ending in .py) are always installed. If a
protocol decoder requires installation of a non-python file, a small
file called 'config' can be created in that protocol decoder's
directory, with the following content:
# comments are ok
extra-install vendorlist.txt commands.txt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Python module name is determined by the directory name (e.g. dcf77),
the *.py file names in that directory don't matter and can be kept
consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't make sense to have one "generic" onewire_transport PD, as
this layer is very much device-specific and such a generic PD would
have to contain an accumulation of all possible features and commands
and handling code of all existing (now and in the future) 1-Wire
devices, which is neither possible nor useful nor elegant.
There are (for example) 1-Wire thermometers, RTCs, EEPROMs,
special-purpose security chips with passwords/keys, battery monitoring
chips, and many many others. They all have a different set of features,
commands and command codes, RAM areas/sizes/partitioning/contents,
protocols, and so on.
Thus, the layering for 1-Wire PD stacks should look like this:
onewire_link -> onewire_network -> <specificdevice>
Examples:
onewire_link -> onewire_network -> maxim_ds28ea00 (special thermometer)
onewire_link -> onewire_network -> maxim_ds2431 (1kbit EEPROM)
onewire_link -> onewire_network -> maxim_ds2417 (RTC)
onewire_link -> onewire_network -> maxim_ds2762 (battery monitor)
onewire_link -> onewire_network -> maxim_ds1961s (SHA-1 eCash iButton)
and so on...
So, renaming onewire_transport to maxim_ds28ea00. The non-DS28EA00
specific code will be dropped and/or moved to other PDs on top of
onewire_network later.
|
